The Safety of Self-managed Abortion: A Dearth of Good-quality Evidence and a Wealth of Misrepresentation.

Self-managed abortion has been particularly prominent in recent discussions of abortion, with the rise of telemedicine abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic and the reality of self-managed illegal abortion in pro-life states following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. There has likewise been much political concern about misinformation and fake news circulated in the media. This article highlights how misinformation and poor quality studies have been used to make implausible claims regarding the safety of telemedicine and the number of deaths from unsafe abortion where abortion is illegal. This puts women's health and lives at risk by authorizing unsafe medical practice and poorly evidenced policy decisions regarding abortion and emergency obstetric care.

The Burden of Unsafe Abortion Six Years before the COVID-19 Era in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: An Analytical Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Unsafe abortion remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity, especially in developing countries with restrictive abortion laws. Disease containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced access to contraception and safe abortion care, potentially increasing rates of unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morbidity and mortality burden of unsafe abortion before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A six-year analytical retrospective study of unsafe abortion at the Federal Medical Centre, Lokoja, Nigeria. All case records of unsafe abortion managed within the study period were retrieved, and relevant data extracted using a purpose-designed proforma. Data obtained was analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Associations between categorical independent and outcome variables were assessed using the Chi square test at 95% confidence level. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The prevalence of unsafe abortion was 8.6 per 1,000 deliveries. More than one-half (37, 52.9%) were medical abortions using misoprostol tablets. The mean age of the women was 23.15+ 3.96 years, and most of them were single (49, 70%), with primary/ secondary education (42, 60%), and of low socioeconomic status (67, 95.7%). Nearly one-half (33, 47.1%) had either never used any modern contraceptive (9, 12.9%) or only used emergency contraception (24, 34.3%). The predominant complications of unsafe abortion included retained product of conception (69, 98.6%), haemorrhagic shock (22,31.4%), and sepsis (19, 27.1%). There were two maternal deaths, giving a case fatality rate of 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Unsafe abortion remains a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in our setting. Improving access to effective modern contraceptives and liberalizing our abortion laws may reduce maternal morbidity and mortality from unsafe abortion.

CONTEXTE: L'avortement à risque reste l'une des principales causes de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles, en particulier dans les pays en développement où les lois sur l'avortement sont restrictives. Les mesures de confinement de la maladie pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 ont réduit l'accès à la contraception et aux soins d'avortement sûrs, augmentant potentiellement les taux de grossesses non désirées et d'avortements à risque. OBJECTIF: Évaluer le fardeau de morbidité et de mortalité de l'avortement à risque avant la pandémie de COVID-19. METHODES: Une étude rétrospective analytique de six ans sur l'avortement à risque au Fédéral Médical Center, Lokoja, Nigeria. Tous les dossiers de tous les cas d'avortement à risque pris en charge au cours de la période d'étude ont été récupérés et les données pertinentes extraites à l'aide d'un formulaire conçu à cet effet. Les données obtenues ont été analysées à l'aide d'IBM SPSS Statistiques pour Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Les associations entre les variables indépendantes catégorielles et les variables de résultat ont été évaluées à l'aide du test du chi carré à un niveau de confiance de 95 %. Une valeur de p <0,05 était considérée comme statistiquement significative. RESULTATS: L'prévalence des avortements à risque était de 8,6 pour 1000 accouchements. Plus de la moitié (37, 52,9%) étaient des avortements médicamenteux utilisant comprimés de misoprostol. L'âge moyen des femmes était de 23,15+ 3,96 ans, et la plupart d'entre elles étaient célibataires (49, 70%), avec une éducation primaire/secondaire (42, 60%) et de statut socio-économique bas (67, 95,7%). Près de la moitié (33, 47,1%) n'avaient jamais utilisé de contraceptif moderne (9,12,9%) ou n'avaient utilisé qu'une contraception d'urgence (24, 34,3%). Les complications prédominantes comprenaient la rétention du produit de conception (69, 98,6 %), le choc hémorragique (22, 31,4 %) et la septicémie (19, 27,1 %). Il y a eu deux décès maternels, soit un taux de létalité de 2,9 %. CONCLUSION: L'avortement à risque reste une cause importante de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles dans notre contexte. L'amélioration de l'accès à des contraceptifs modernes efficaces et la libéralisation de nos lois sur l'avortement réduiront la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles dues à l'avortement à risque. Mots-clés: Planification familiale, Avortement illégal/criminel, morbidité et mortalité maternelles, Produit de la conception retenu, Besoin non satisfait.

An exploratory examination of attitudes toward illegal abortion in the U.S. through endorsement of various punishments.

OBJECTIVES: We examined people's (1) attitudes about abortion using an item from Pew Research Center (i.e., whether abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases, or illegal in all cases) and (2) support for different punishments if abortion were illegal in all cases for different people involved in the abortion-the pregnant person, their partner, an informant and the healthcare provider. STUDY DESIGN: We administered a web-based survey to 2,204 U.S. adults using quota-based sampling. Post-stratification weights were applied to the data so that the sample was comparable to U.S. benchmarks for gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, age, education, and political affiliation. We compared endorsement of various punishments for a pregnant person, their partner, informant, and healthcare provider. Additionally, we compared the endorsement of these punishments across response options of Pew's abortion legality item. RESULTS: Overall, most of our sample indicated that abortion should be legal in most (34%) or legal in all scenarios (21%). However, if abortion were illegal in all circumstances, most of our sample supported some form of punishment for the pregnant person (72%-75%), their partner (65%-68%), and healthcare providers (70%-71%), but not informants (47%-49%). Among the endorsed punishments, therapy/education typically received the most support. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision and the subsequent overturning of Roe v. Wade, abortion is illegal in a significant number of states and a punishable offense. Our findings suggest that current punishments associated with many of these laws are counter to public sentiment. IMPLICATIONS: Despite majority support for some punishment, the categories of "no punishment" or therapy/education had the most support. Given the lack of plurality or majority support for fines or incarceration, abortion laws including these punishments, including bounty-style laws passed in Texas and Oklahoma, may be out of step with public opinion.

Illegal abortion and reproductive injustice in the Pacific Islands: A qualitative analysis of court data.

The Oceania region is home to some of the world's most restrictive abortion laws, and there is evidence of Pacific Island women's reproductive oppression across several aspects of their reproductive lives, including in relation to contraceptive decision-making, birthing, and fertility. In this paper we analyse documents from court cases in the Pacific Islands regarding the illegal procurement of abortion. We undertook inductive thematic analysis of documents from eighteen illegal abortion court cases from Pacific Island countries. Using the lens of reproductive justice, we discuss the methods of abortion, the reported context of these abortions, and the ways in which these women and abortion were constructed in judges' summing up, judgements, or sentencing. Our analysis of these cases reveals layers of sexual and reproductive oppression experienced by these women that are related to colonialism, women's socioeconomic disadvantage, gendered violence, limited reproductive control, and the punitive consequences related to not performing gender appropriately.

Saúde mental e abortamento voluntário na audiência pública da ADPF442/STF / Mental health and voluntary abortion in the public hearing of ADPF442/STF / Salud mental y aborto voluntario en la audiencia pública del ADPF442/STF

O estudo teve como objetivo identificar os argumentos da estratégia de persuasão dos discursos apresentados na audiência pública sobre a Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental-ADPF 442, realizada em 2018, cujo propósito era discutir sobre a interrupção voluntária da gravidez até a 12ª semana. Para tal, foi realizada uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, analítico-descritiva e documental. O objeto de análise foi o registro da audiência, apresentado em vídeo, disponibilizado na plataforma digital YouTube, e em ata lavrada pelo STF, ambos de acesso público. A partir de uma análise do discurso, identificou-se os argumentos utilizados na estratégia de persuasão, que foram sistematizados em quatro categorias de argumentos para cada um dos dois grupos identificados: o grupo pró e o grupo contra a descriminalização do aborto. As três primeiras categorias, Saúde mental, Direito e Saúde pública, mesmo com diferenças na forma de apresentar o argumento, se repetem nos dois grupos. Todavia, a quarta categoria, Pressupostos, se diferenciou. No grupo pró descriminalização do aborto, apresentou-se como Pressupostos filosóficos e científicos, e no grupo contra, como Pressupostos morais. Por fim, a defesa da saúde mental das mulheres foi o principal argumento numa forma de humanizar o sofrimento vivido pelas que desejam abortar e não encontram o suporte do Estado para assegurar sua dignidade, cidadania e efetiva igualdade, garantidas constitucionalmente.(AU)

The study aimed to identify the arguments of the persuasion strategy of the speeches presented at the public hearing on the Action Against the Violation of Constitutional Fundamental Rights -ADPF 442, held in 2018, whose purpose was to discuss the voluntary interruption of pregnancy until the 12th week. To this end, a qualitative, analytical-descriptive, and documentary research was carried out. The object of analysis was the video recording of the hearing available on the YouTube platform, and in minutes drawn up by the STF, both of which are public. Based on a discourse analysis, the arguments used in the persuasion strategy were identified, which were systematized into four categories of arguments for each of the two identified groups: the group for and the group against the decriminalization of abortion. The first three categories, Mental Health, Law and Public Health, even with differences in the way of presenting the argument, are repeated in both groups. However, the fourth category, Assumptions, differed. In the group for the decriminalization of abortion, it was presented as Philosophical and Scientific Assumptions, whereas the group against, as Moral Assumptions. Finally, the defense of women's mental health was the main argument in a way of humanizing the suffering experienced by those who wish to have an abortion and do not find the support of the State to guarantee their dignity, citizenship, and effective equality, constitutionally guaranteed.(AU)

El estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los argumentos de la estrategia de persuasión de los discursos presentados en la audiencia pública sobre el Argumento por Incumplimiento de un Percepto Fundamental -ADPF 442, realizada en 2018, con el objetivo de discutir la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo hasta la 12.ª semana. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una investigación cualitativa, analítico-descriptiva y documental. El objeto de análisis fue la grabación de la audiencia, que está disponible en la plataforma digital YouTube, y actas levantadas por el Supremo Tribunal Federal -STF, ambas de acceso público. A partir de un análisis del discurso se identificaron los argumentos utilizados en la estrategia de persuasión, los cuales se sistematizaron en cuatro categorías de argumentos para cada uno de los dos grupos identificados: el grupo pro y el grupo en contra de la despenalización del aborto. Las tres primeras categorías ("salud mental", "derecho" y "salud pública") aún con diferencias en la forma de presentar el argumento se repiten en ambos grupos. Pero difiere la cuarta categoría "supuestos". En el grupo a favor de la despenalización del aborto se presentó como "supuestos filosóficos y científicos", y en el grupo en contra, como "supuestos morales". Finalmente, la defensa de la salud mental de las mujeres fue el principal argumento en un intento por humanizar el sufrimiento que viven aquellas que desean abortar y no encuentran el apoyo del Estado para garantizar su dignidad, ciudadanía e igualdad efectiva, preconizadas por la Constitución.(AU)

Violência sexual e aborto legal: possibilidades e desafios da atuação psicológica / Sexual offence and legal abortion: opportunities and challenges from psychological working / Violencia sexual y aborto legal: posibilidades y desafíos de la atención psicológica

A violência sexual e o aborto legal são temas tabus em nossa sociedade. No campo da saúde, a(o) psicóloga(o) atua em fases distintas, seja na avaliação psicológica do pedido pelo aborto legal, que culminará ou não em sua aquiescência; seja no momento posterior à solicitação, no atendimento em enfermarias ou ambulatorial. Partindo de relato de experiência, este artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre as possibilidades e desafios da atuação psicológica no atendimento em saúde para pessoas em situação de gestação decorrente de violência sexual e que buscam pelo aborto legal. Para tanto, dividimos o artigo em três momentos. No primeiro deles, será possível encontrar dados conceituais, estatísticos e históricos sobre ambos os temas, trazendo recortes nacionais e internacionais. No segundo, trazemos apontamentos sobre o que chamamos de "eixos norteadores", ou seja, dialogamos com aspectos fundamentais para o trabalho nesta seara, sendo eles gênero, família, sexualidade e trauma. Por fim, no terceiro, aprofundamos a reflexão sobre o atendimento psicológico atrelado aos conceitos já discutidos, analisando de forma crítica principalmente um dos pontos mais espinhosos da atuação: a avaliação para aprovação (ou recusa) do pedido pelo aborto. Apoiamo-nos no referencial psicanalítico e defendemos que esta atuação psicológica é primordialmente uma oferta de cuidado, comprometido com as demandas das pessoas atendidas e com a promoção de saúde mental, e consideramos que o papel da psicologia é essencial para o reconhecimento do sofrimento e dos efeitos do abandono socioinstitucional na vida do público atendido.(AU)

Sexual abuse and legal abortion are taboo subjects in our society. On the health area, the psychologist works on different fields, such as psychological evaluation from the request of legal abortion, that will end or not on its approval, and also in a further moment, either the care on wards or ambulatorial treatment. Relying on a case report, this article aims to contemplate the possibilities and challenges from psychological work on healthcare to pregnant women from sexual violence and seek legal abortion. For this purpose, we divide this article in three moments. On the first, it will find definitions, statistics, and historical data about both issues, including national and international information. On the second, we bring notes called 'guiding pillar,' that is, we interact with fundamental aspects from this area, such as gender, family, sexuality, and trauma. On the third one, in-depth discussions we dwell on psychological care tied to the concepts previously addressed, critically analyzing one of the hardest moments of working in this area: the evaluation to approve (or refuse) the request for abortion. We lean over psychoanalytic thoughts and argue that this psychological work is primarily an offer of care, committed to the needs from those who seek us and to promoting good mental health and, also, we consider that psychology is essential to acknowledge the suffering and the effects of social and institutional neglect on the lives of the people seen.(AU)

La violencia sexual y el aborto son temas tabús en nuestra sociedad. En el campo de la salud, el(la) psicólogo(a) actúa en diferentes fases: en la evaluación psicológica de la solicitud del aborto legal, que culminará o no en su obtención, y/o en el momento posterior a la solicitud en la atención en enfermería o ambulatorio. Desde un reporte de experiencia, este artículo pretende reflexionar sobre las posibilidades y los desafíos de la Psicología en la atención en salud para personas en estado de embarazo producto de violencia sexual y que buscan un aborto legal. Para ello, este artículo está dividido en tres momentos. En el primer, presenta datos conceptuales, estadísticos e históricos sobre los dos temas, trayendo recortes nacionales e internacionales. En el segundo, comenta los llamados "ejes temáticos", es decir, se establece un diálogo con aspectos fundamentales para el trabajo en este ámbito, como género, familia, sexualidad y trauma. Por último, en el tercer, profundiza en la reflexión sobre la atención psicológica asociada a los conceptos discutidos, analizando de forma crítica uno de los puntos más espinosos de la actuación: la evaluación para la aprobación (o negativa) de la solicitud de aborto. Se utilizó el referencial psicoanalítico y se argumenta que esta atención psicológica es sobre todo una forma de cuidado, comprometida con las demandas de las personas atendidas y la promoción de la salud mental, y el papel de la Psicología es esencial para reconocer el sufrimiento y los efectos del abandono socioinstitucional en la vida del público atendido.(AU)

The Shift From Criminalization to Legalization of Abortion in Argentina.

This Viewpoint discusses passage and implementation of Law 27.610, which legalized abortion in Argentina under certain circumstances, and examines the ongoing clinical issues and legal challenges to the law.

The use of misoprostol in the termination of pregnancy: a review of studies carried. / O uso do misoprostol na interrupção da gestação: revisão de estudos realizados no Brasil.

The use of misoprostol for abortifacient purposes is a phenomenon observed in Brazil since the late 1980s. The drug started to be used at that time for self-induced abortion, when it began to be commercialized for the treatment of peptic ulcer. Its access was restricted from 1998 onwards, but the drug continues to be commercialized illegally. The objective of this article is to summarize the knowledge produced by research in Brazil about induced abortion and the use of misoprostol. An integrative review of original studies carried out in Brazil and published in journals indexed in SciELO, PubMed and Lilacs databases was performed. The search found 68 titles, and 28 articles were included in the review. Most women who induced pregnancy interruption were young and did it before 15 gestational weeks. The rate of misoprostol use ranged from 89% to 36%. This drug is effective for terminating pregnancy in the first trimester and has a low rate of complications. However, the more socially vulnerable the woman is, the greater are the health risks in the abortion process. The conclusion is that the purchase of misoprostol as an abortifacient is facilitated, despite it being prohibited, and its complications are associated with the context of vulnerability of the pregnant woman.

O uso do misoprostol com finalidade abortiva é um fenômeno observado no Brasil desde o final da década de 1980. O medicamento começou a ser utilizado nessa época para autoindução do aborto, quando passou a ser comercializado para o tratamento de úlcera péptica. Seu acesso foi restringido a partir de 1998, porém o fármaco continua sendo comercializado na ilegalidade. O objetivo desse artigo é sintetizar o conhecimento produzido em pesquisas no Brasil sobre o aborto induzido e o uso do misoprostol. Foi realizada uma revisão integrativa de estudos originais feitos no Brasil e publicados em revistas indexadas nas bases SciELO, PubMed e Lilacs. Foram encontrados 68 títulos e incluídos 28 artigos na revisão. A maioria das mulheres que induz a interrupção da gestação é jovem e o faz antes das 15 semanas de gestação. A taxa de utilização do misoprostol variou entre 89% e 36%. Esse medicamento é eficaz para a interrupção da gestação no primeiro trimestre e apresenta baixa taxa de complicações. Contudo, quanto mais vulnerável socialmente a mulher, maiores os riscos para a saúde no processo do abortamento. Conclui-se que a compra do misoprostol como abortivo é facilitada, apesar de proibida, e suas complicações estão associadas ao contexto de vulnerabilidade da gestante.

Misoprostol on trial: a descriptive study of the criminalization of an essential medicine in Brazil.

Misoprostol is a medicine with a "double" social life recorded in several places, including Brazil. Within formal and authorized health facilities, it is an essential medicine, used for life-saving obstetric procedures. On the streets, or in online informal markets, misoprostol is treated as a dangerous drug used to induce illegal abortions. In the Brazilian case, despite a rich anthropological and public health analysis of the social consequences of misoprostol's double life, there are no studies on the legal implications. This article offers such descriptive analysis, presenting and examining a comprehensive dataset of how Brazilian courts have treated misoprostol in the past three decades. It consists of an encompassing mapping of the "when, where, how, and who" of misoprostol criminalization in Brazil, pointing to the unjust consequences of the use of criminal law for the purpose of protecting public health.

Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis.

Significant scientific progress has been made toward artificial womb technology, which would allow part of human gestation to occur outside the body. Bioethical and legal scholars have argued that artificial wombs will challenge defences of abortion based in arguments for protecting bodily autonomy, for a pregnant person could have the foetus transferred to an artificial womb instead of being terminated. Drawing on examples from the common law jurisdictions of Canada, the USA, and the UK, I assess three ways scholars have argued abortion might be defended after ectogenesis (through redefining foetal viability, through a property right, and through a right to avoid genetic parenthood). I argue that while each of these proposals has strategic merit, each has significant legal and ethical limitations. Taking the normative position that abortion will remain a vital healthcare resource, I make the case for protecting abortion rights from a challenge posed by ectogenesis by focusing on decriminalisation.

Fatal necrotizing fasciitis in illegal abortion and the negligence tort.

The present paper is a case-based review on rare complications of illegal abortion, i.e., necrotizing fasciitis missed early by the treating gynecologists which landed up into a negligence tort against the physicians. The common complications of the abortion like incomplete abortion, haemorrhage, sepsis, etc. are usually handled successfully by the gynecologists; however, early detection often missed when a rare complication like necrotising fasciitis occurs. Eventually leading to litigations in case of death of the patient. The newer techniques have reduced the complications in medically terminated pregnancies (MTP); however, the deaths due to illegal abortions carried out by the clandestine abortion practitioners (CAP) poses a challenge, especially in rural areas. A 30-year-old woman went for an illegal abortion from a CAP to avoid social stigma. She developed sepsis & necrotising fasciitis (NF) of right lower limb due to intra-vaginal use of abortifacient herbs prescribed by the CAP. She was succumbed to the complications of necrotising fasciitis allegedly due to delayed diagnosis by the gynecologists. This led to a negligence tort filed by her family members against the treating gynecologists. The prudent medicolegal and medical steps are discussed here, that could have prevented such sequel.

Interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en Latinoamérica, superando barreras / Voluntary interruption of the pregnancy in Latin America, overcoming barriers

Resumen Introducción: El embarazo no planeado o no intencional y el aborto son situaciones que afectan la vida de mujeres a nivel mundial, sin distinción de etnia, edad, riqueza, o ubicación geográfica, sin embargo, tiene una mayor posibilidad de presentarse y generar consecuencias negativas en mujeres con ciertas determinantes sociales. Objetivo: Mostrar el estado actual de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en países de Latinoamérica y del Caribe con énfasis en el reciente avance de la legislación argentina sucedido durante diciembre del 2020. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda no estructurada de información sobre la legislación del aborto en países de Latinoamérica y del Caribe y se hizo una revisión de tema sobre aspectos actuales y relevantes de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Conclusiones: Es necesario que prestadores de servicios de salud y sociedad latinoamericana repasen las lecciones aprendidas de diferentes países sobre las consecuencias negativas para la salud de las mujeres y sus familias debido a las restricciones para acceder al aborto seguro. El mejoramiento de la calidad y las capacidades de los sistemas de salud en los países de bajos y medianos recursos, con mayor inversión e investigación en temas de salud sexual y reproductiva, resultará en la eliminación de barreras e inequidades en la prestación de atención médica a las mujeres, respetando sus derechos y autonomía.

Abstract Introduction: Unplanned or unintended pregnancy and abortion are situations that affect the lives of women worldwide without distinction of ethnicity, age, economic level, or geographical location. However, they have a greater probability of occurring and negative consequences in women with certain social determinants. Objective: Our main objective is to show the current state of the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in Latin American and Caribbean countries with special emphasis on the recent advance of the legislation of Argentina that occurred last December. Methodology: An unstructured search for information about Abortion Legislation in Latin American and Caribbean countries was carried out and a subject revision on current and relevant aspects of Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy was made. Conclusions: It is necessary that as Health Service providers and as a Latin American Society, we review the lessons learned from different countries about the negative consequences on the health of women and their families due to the restrictions for accessing legal abortions. Improving the quality and capacity of the health system in low- and middle- income countries, in addition to greater investment and research in sexual and reproductive health issues, will derive a removal of barriers and inequity related to the provision of medical attention for women while respecting their rights and autonomy.

Barriers to access second-trimester abortion: A case report.

Despite the implementation of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy (CTOP) Act, many women continue to procure illegal abortions in South Africa. A lack of knowledge of the CTOP Act and poor access to legal abortion in public health facilities is a big challenge. In the scope of the CTOP Act, the termination of pregnancy is a time-restricted health service, and women presented to a health care facility in the second trimester have encounter more obstacles to access the services.

Abortion laws and women's health.

We examine the impact of progressive and regressive abortion legislation on women's health in Mexico. Following a 2007 reform in the Federal District of Mexico which decriminalised and subsidised early-term elective abortion, multiple other Mexican states increased sanctions on illegal abortion. We observe that the original legalisation resulted in a sharp decline in maternal morbidity, particularly morbidity due to haemorrhage early in pregnancy. We observe small or null impacts on women's health from increasing sanctions on illegal abortion. These results quantify the considerable improvements in non-mortal health outcomes flowing from legal access to abortion.

Indiciamento das mulheres pela prática do abortamento: a (des)continuidade do discurso punitivista / Indictment of women for the practice of abortion: the (dis) continuity of the punitive discourse / Incriminación de mujeres por la práctica del aborto: la (dis)continuidad del discurso punitivo

Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar os argumentos empregados na condenação ou absolvição das mulheres acusadas de abortamento, especialmente os processos que foram suspensos. Analisamos sentenças e acórdãos referentes ao autoaborto (art. 124 do Código Penal) dos Tribunais de Justiça dos estados de São Paulo e de Minas Gerais. Como resultado do levantamento, constatamos a reiterada concessão da suspensão condicional do processo ou da pena, o que poderia ser considerado medida despenalizadora, por acarretar a extinção da punibilidade. No entanto, ante a aceitação e devido cumprimento das condições impostas pelo prazo fixado, o conteúdo das decisões de suspensão (de processo e de pena) explicita o caráter moral das sentenças, bem como a discriminação de gênero e a violência institucional. Assim, discute-se os fins da criminalização do abortamento e as consequências para o exercício pleno dos direitos sexuais e reprodutivos das mulheres.

Abstract This article's objective was to analyse the arguments used for the conviction or acquittal of women accused of abortion, especially in processes that were suspended. We analysed judicial decisions from the Justice Courts of São Paulo and Minas Gerais States. As a result of the analysis of these materials, we note the repeated granting of conditional suspension of the process or penalty, which could be considered a decriminalizing measure. However, as it entails the extinction of punishment, once accepted and respected the conditions imposed by a fixed term, the content of the concessive decisions exhibit the explicit moral judgement of the convictions, as well as gender discrimination and institutional violence. Thus, we discuss the overall aim of the criminalisation of abortion and the consequences for the full exercise of women's sexual and reproductive rights.

Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar los argumentos utilizados en la condena o absolución de mujeres acusadas de aborto, especialmente los procesos que fueron suspendidos. Analizamos sentencias relacionadas con el aborto autoproducido (art. 124 del Código Penal brasileño) de los Tribunales de Justicia de los estados de São Paulo y Minas Gerais. Como resultado de la investigación, se observa el reiterado otorgamiento de suspensión condicional del proceso o sanción, lo que podría ser considerado una medida despenalizadora, ya que resulta en la extinción de la pena. Sin embargo, ante la aceptación y debido cumplimiento de las condiciones impuestas por el plazo fijado, el contenido de las decisiones de suspensión (de proceso y sentencia) hace explícito el carácter moral de las sentencias, así como la discriminación de género y la violencia institucional. Así, se discute el propósito de criminalizar el aborto y las consecuencias para el pleno ejercicio de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos de las mujeres.